Ensemble Gombert during a recording session

Ensemble Gombert is Melbourne's outstanding chamber choir, noted
for its pure intonation and historic approach to choral sound and
style. Named after Nicolas Gombert (c. 1495 - 1560), who has been
largely ignored in the twentieth century despite an exemplary
reputation amongst his contemporaries, the Ensemble specialises in
a cappella performance of Franco-Flemish music of the
High Renaissance.

John O'Donnell - University Organist, Monash University - is an internationally
renowned keyboard artist, choral conductor and musicologist. As organist and
harpsichordist he tours Europe regularly and is the first person ever to perform
Bach's complete keyboard works in public. His recordings of the complete
keyboard works of Johann Caspar Kerll (which he had previously edited for
the Viennese publisher Doblinger) and organ works of Bach have met with
international acclaim, the latter nominated "Recording of the Year" (2000) in
the International Record Review. He is keyboard player of Capella Corelli,
musical director of the choir of the Canterbury
Fellowship, and founder/director of Ensemble Gombert. He is currently
completing new editions of the complete keyboard works of Johann Pachelbel
and Nicolas de Grigny.

|
Soprano | Alto |
Claerwen Jones
Kathryn Pisani
Maria Pisani
Fiona Seers
Deborah Summerbell
Carol Veldhoven
|
Niki Ebacioni
Jenny George
Jenny Mathers
Belinda Wong
|
|
Tenor
|
Bass
|
Peter Campbell
Vaughan McAlley
Stuart Tennant
Tim Van Nooten
|
Tim Daly
Tom Reid
Julien Robinson
|
|

Deborah Summerbell (Sop) and Claerwen Jones (Sop) confer during a CD recording
|

It is from Hermann Finck in 1566 that we learn much about sixteenth century
choral sound and choral practices: "The treble should be sung with a delicate
and sonorous tone, the bass, however, with a harder and heavier tone: the
middle voices should move with uniformity and try to match themselves to the
outer parts sweetly and harmoniously." A constant dynamic level should be
maintained throughout a composition "so that there is no discrepancy in sound
between the beginning and the end: the tone should not be too soft or too
loud, but rather, like a properly built organ, the ensemble should remain
unaltered and constant... The higher a voice rises, the quieter and more
gentle should be the tone; the lower it goes, the richer should be the sound,
just as in an organ... When there is a tasteful point of imitation at the
beginning of a work this is to be rendered with a more definite and distinct
tone than is employed elsewhere, and the following parts, if they start with
the same point as the first, should perform it in the same way. This should
be observed by all the parts whenever a new point occurs..."
All these observations are supported by other sixteenth century writers,
from whom we also learn further details, all of which have contributed to
the approach we take to our performances of music of this time. It is only
in the late sixteenth century, and through the influences of the madrigal,
that dynamic chiaroscuro becomes a component of choral performance.
Secondly, our approach to tuning is based on the ideals of pure
intonation. Pure major thirds are considerably smaller than equal-tempered
major thirds, which are really quite discordant. Pure minor thirds, on the
other hand, are wider than the equal-tempered approximation. Semitones are
major (diatonic) or minor (chromatic), the former almost twice the size of
the latter.
There is a further element of our performance of music of the High
Renaissance that differs from what listeners may encounter elsewhere. This
is our approach to musica ficta, based on the research of director, John
O'Donnell, which deviates considerably from what has in our century been
considered appropriate for music of this era. It is clear that composers
of the period were no more bound by so-called rules of composition than
composers of any other period, and the music is full of forbidden false
fifths and false unisons and octaves. The latter are what we should generally
call simultaneous false relations, traditionally regarded as an English
phenomenon of the period of Tallis and Byrd. But according to early writers
it was Gombert who was master of the false relation, and its use by him and
his contemporaries exhibits much greater variety than is encountered in the
typical English cadence.
|